The Lady Garden

Tea and Strumpets

Monthly Archives: October 2011

Sharing the love

Things we liked, or didn’t like, from around the internet this week.

Via Ally on Twitter, on talking about gendered body parts. Ally also has a massive round up of feminsty links at her place, which you should go look at. And watch her dance, because she is teh cuteness.

A guest post on The F-Word, by Lorrie Hearts, about baby-friendly hospitals. She taps into one of my (Deb) pet peeves about the baby-friendly hospitals initiative:

The tendency to remove agency and autonomy from women who have had children is something that I find highly disturbing. … “But it’s best for baby” continues to be the phrase on the flag. When, exactly, people stopped prioritising what’s best for women is a question that remains to be answered.

Slutwalk (finally) comes to New York. All those “hundreds of scantily-clad marchers” are shown in this video, plus a good round up of links.  Also, plenty of feministy bloggers in the video, skeevy dudes taking photos, and my new favourite sign, the one that reads: </patriarchy> We need that on a tshirt. More from Sady Doyle here.

Here at TLG, we try to be inclusive of everyone, yes, including men. We think it’s important to have them at the table, to include them in the debate. And look, when it comes to equality in developing nations, at least, we’re right.

Anne Else was invited to speak to her old school, Auckland Girls’ Grammar: Time Travel. It seems that Anne has been subversive for a Very Long Time.

Why were the teachers so concerned about our class? Because we were irritatingly different. When we disapproved of a teacher, we united in silence strikes, refusing to answer any questions. Quite a few of us were unusually independent and strong-minded, finding creative ways to subvert what we considered petty rules, for example about uniforms and hair. Some of us wore black underwear, as required – but it was black lace. Yes, there were underwear inspections in those days.

Greta Christina asks, “Is Everyone Basically Bisexual?” (Here’s a clue: the answer is ‘no’.)

The brilliant Pervocracy addresses a question that we talk about a lot here: what do ideas about relationships in the kink/BDSM/polyamorous world have to offer when it comes to thinking and talking about relationships in general.

What kind of relationship you have is your choice, and one choice isn’t better than another.  What’s important is that you make a choice.  That even if you’re you’re monogamous, vanilla, and heterosexual–you’re doing it because it’s what you want and because you and your partner have agreed to it, not because that’s what people do.  What’s important isn’t what path you take, but that you know there are paths.

Also. Dear New York Post: fuck you. Fuck you very much. And when you say “giving it up”? What the hell is “it”? Because it must be a thing I don’t have any more after that. You know, like the vestiges of your self-respect after you published that pack of shit.

And lastly, a little bit of eye-candy. Men posed as pinups.

Quickie: Your Magic Boobs

Hey, ladies! Did you know, your boobs can drive men “crazy”? All by such simple techniques as pressing them against glass and applying lipstick with them?

But come on, The Frisky, why stop there? My boobs, recently described as “the size of small planets” can do so much more than drive men crazy. I like to get them to fix me a martini on a cool evening. They’re incredibly useful as a place to write reminders to myself. And, of course, you can use them to stop traffic, get out of fines, earn a promotion.

And why stop there? I’m sure, if they put their minds to it, my boobs could write a novel. They find simple equations pretty easy, so I am trying to work them up to higher maths. Why stop at sexual pleasure, and that trivial giving babies nourishment thing! Make your tits work for their keep. That empty space on your chest shouldn’t be rent free.

[Updated: Per Xanthippe's excellent comment, what could he be doing with his 'bollocks' to drive you crazy? A good line in gift wrapping? We need a list of 10]

That’s nice, but…

Via Twitter: “This secret on the PostSecret App is the most hearted of the day”:

There’s a part of me that wants to salute that person in Ohio, to thank them for reminding us that we’re all lovable, and deserving of love. That being ‘bigger’ is no signifier of anything other than of itself. I’d like to thank all the people that “hearted” it, who innocently wanted to make fat women feel better. I want to just smile at this. I want to hug it to me and print it out and post it on my wall.

I’d like to be able to do that. But my feminist brain won’t let me. My feminist brain gets me in trouble all the time, fuck it.

My Feminist Brain wants to point out that “bigger women” are not always “curvy”. It wants to mention that for most people, “curvy” suggests Christina Hendricks and Sofia Vergara, not Beth Ditto or Melissa McCarthy. It wants me to note that while I had no trouble thinking of Hendricks and Vergara, I had to rack my brain to think of “bigger women” who aren’t all vavavoom curves and giant tits.

I’d like to be able to just see the intent of this, and not have “intent isn’t magic” screaming at the back of my head. The problem with that particular meme being that while no, intent isn’t magic, it is still important. The person who posted this meant well. They meant to make people like me feel good about myself.

And therein lies the biggest problem for my Feminist Brain. Random Person in Ohio doesn’t get that one postcard is never going to cancel out the thousands of other messages that fat is bad and unhealthy and unattractive, and of course no one could ever love someone like me. What RPiO doesn’t get is that it doesn’t matter that there are some people who find “bigger girls” attractive.

What matters is that women, no matter what our size, can never measure up. That calling someone curvy is just body-policing of a different kind. (Be fat, sure, but you better have great tits and a small waist and nice legs. And don’t be afraid to show off those breasts – they’re your only good feature. Oh, but not too much. No one really wants to see that much of you.) That we will always always be defined first by how we look, by our bodies.

Or, hey, maybe I’m just a contrary bitch who can’t take a compliment.

My personal journey with girl love

I went to a tiny, single sex Catholic school for all but one year of my high school education. When you think of a cliché Catholic schoolgirl in a heavy woollen skirt with too much hair product trying to get the attention of some boy at a bus stop after school – you are probably visualising a memory of mine. The school was too small for comfort, everyone knew your business, everyone had probably crushed on or drunkenly pashed your current/ex/future boyfriend and compliments from other girls were either given bitterly or in exchange for one back.

I remember the first time I ever had a genuine compliment from a group of other girls. I was 16 and at my boyfriend’s school play for his large, co-educational public school known for its diversity (which in 16-year-old-girl speak means ‘gay kids and goths’). Backstage during the play my boyfriend had pointed me out to his mostly female castmates, who then told them how pretty they thought I was. When he told me this later I recoiled and asked him what they wanted from me. When he looked at me with confusion and said “What? What do you mean? They just thought you were pretty.” I knew then that there had been something deeply wrong with my interactions with other women up until that point.

The following year, for my last year of secondary education, I enrolled at the aforementioned large co-ed public school. It was the best decision I’ve made in my life for many reasons, but one of the main ones was my exposure to girl love. The culture at this school was different; boys weren’t seen as distant prizes – they were classmates, heteronormativity was criticised, competitiveness between girls was seen as immature and ignorant, and every day was mufti day. Meaning that my usual routine of planning 3 months in advance for the 2 non-uniformed school days of the year so I could wear my Most Expensive Clothes was out. And good riddance.

On my first day I was taken by the hand and shown where all my classes were by a girl who was to be one of my best friends from then on. I was warmly welcomed and complimented by my new classmates, which sounds shallow but cannot be under-valued as an important part of feeling good about yourself as a teenager. I formed a strong, solid group of friends made up of boys and girls who loved each other fiercely and are still just as tight today.

Thanks to the amazing standard set by my friends, in just one year I changed from a deeply competitive teenage girl, to a young woman with an appreciation and celebration of the beauty and wit of other women. I also learned that I, like many other young women, were attracted to other women. And that this was OK. This transformation is something that spoke to my inner most ethics that had probably been there all along but was buried and confused by what was seen to be ‘normal’ (competitive) interactions with other girls.

Since discovering and celebrating girl love, I have taken it with me everywhere I have gone. Am I perfect? Fuck no. Have I still been competitive with other women? Of course. It’s hard not to when I feel like society deliberately pits us against each other. However, girl love is something I am committed to and will always strive for, because at the end of the day it’s a fuckload better than the alternative which I have lived.

That said, this bubble that I have created for myself with my amazing lady friends means that my interactions with ‘the real world’ can be very, very disheartening. In pretty much every workplace I have been in I have experienced competitiveness, one-upmanship, and pettiness from other women. Yeah sure it is probably all ‘normal office stuff’, in the same way that teen girls vying for popularity while slicing others down is ‘normal’ – but that doesn’t mean it is good for anyone. And it is disproportionately female on female.

I am an assertive, confident women who also manages to be a total bumbling goof sometimes. I am very young (always the youngest in my post-university workplaces), I am talkative and easily excited, but I work my butt off. I am curvy and fairly attractive. And to be honest, I don’t feel like these qualities have done me any favours in the workplace:

  • Once I was taken aside by a senior female co-worker and told that my breasts and the way I dressed was offensive and embarrassing, and that she was leaving me out of a key workplace opportunity because of this.
  • Once my boss from a former job told me in the tone of voice one would use when describing a disgusting bug that I was the most confident women she had ever met.
  • Once I was told that I was a “young woman” so I should just “stop acting like I know anything”
  • I was told by my current boss: “I would like to be a mentor to you if I have the time, but if it doesn’t work out I would hate to have to tell the sector all about you, because it’s a very small sector and that wouldn’t be good for your future.”
I genuinely don’t think that there is a big jump between two 14 year old girls tearing shreds of their friend behind her back because they want to celebrate feeling more powerful than her, and having a lady in your office who relishes in making you feel like you’re 5cms small. I think it is all part of normalised girl hate which society uses to sell us shit and to make men feel more powerful. And I really really hate it. When I first left university I was desperate for a more experienced woman to mentor me, to help me celebrate my strengths and learn from my mistakes. Now I am just desperate to have the women I work with cut the nasty shit with each other.

I am, however, hugely fortunate to have become involved as a volunteer with a women-centred sexual violence agency run by a group of women who have inadvertently become mentors to me, but have also created an environment of two-way guidance and support. I am so thankful for these women, and for this agency, however I wish it wasn’t such a rare find. I am not the only young woman at the beginning of my career desperately wishing that she didn’t have to look too far outside the office for guidance and support from women who have established their careers and learned a lot in the process.

I am also not the only young woman who had a nasty shock when she realised the school yard girl hate doesn’t stop in the school yard. And I’m not sure how to make it better; I’m not really sure if there’s anything I can do about it from my end. However, what I feel like I can control is how I act towards women who will be me in 5-10 years time. I am trying to take every opportunity I have with younger women to give them the girl love I would have wanted myself, and I am trying to encourage everyone else to do the same.

 

Living Up

When I was a teenager, my English teacher used me to illustrate the difference between “immoral” and “amoral”. I’ve never been much of a one for sticking to (or rebelling against) conventional ethical or ideological codes. That doesn’t mean I don’t have one, though. I’ve just worked it out, step by step, by myself. And yes, sometimes that means taking years and years to get to where most other people started off.

One of the things about this process is that when you let yourself down, ethically or ideologically, you’ve got no-one to blame but yourself. In the last week or so, there’ve been three incidents that have really made me think about whether or not I’m failing to live up to my own ideals.

We had EQC inspectors through the house this weekend, finally. And it was all great, and the guy I was talking to was just awesome and friendly and incredibly easy to deal with. Right up to the point where he asked for the floor area of the house, I gave it to him off the top of my head, and he replied, “Wow. Not bad for a girl.”

Now, fortunately my ethical code doesn’t say “You must fight every single battle,” because honestly, I was so gob-smacked that he’d said that, that I did nothing at all. I just sort of sat there while the conversation progressed. And later I had to think about why I’d done that, why I hadn’t called him on being a sexist arsehole, and if it was worth him liking me enough to decide our kitchen vinyl did need replacing.

Scenario Two. We have these neighbours we don’t get on very well with. Mostly because they’re fuckwads. But we try to have some kind of constructive contact with them so we’re not just calling noise control and the cops and hating on them all the time. So when the guy from next door came over and asked if I wanted to come back to his house for a coffee and a couple of cigarettes, I said yes. Reluctantly, but yes.

Now, my partner wasn’t home but my daughter was. I let Twitter know where I was going. There is nothing quite like the sense that 400 people have your back. I took my phone. Why? Because sometimes the guy next door stands at their kitchen window, or on their back doorstep, and watches me get dressed.

Anyway, I started over, he met me out on the street, and suggested we drive down to the surf club. I claimed to not be able to leave my daughter. In the end, he came over to my side and we sat out on our new deck in the sun. And he asked me if I would take photographs of him in his underwear. He asked me about my own underwear preferences.

Now, thing is, when he decided to verbally harass me, he chose to play in MY field. Half an hour later we were talking about Chris Cairns’s performances in Scotland. I handled him. That’s not to say it didn’t utterly squick me out, but I dealt with it.

My problem was a couple of days later, realising that I was changing the clothes I wore in case he saw me. I was unconsciously trying to be dowdier and less attractive. I was trying to see if he was around before I went outside. And my Code of Conduct says “Don’t let the fuckers change your life.” I caught myself. I went back to being all TOFO. I’m fully aware that might seem like a dangerous choice to some people, and the previous just a sensible precaution, but it’s my life, and I will not live it like that.

Incident Number Three. After it coming up in a couple of conversations lately, I acquired a copy of Secretary, which I basically hadn’t watched since it came out, when it was quite the Big Fucking Deal for me. I mean, how often do you see a complex but sympathetic depiction of a BDSM relationship in mainstream cinema? (I was going to make a parenthetical comment here about the Invisible Dom/me phenomenon, but it might actually be another column.)

And I had to think about whether I was going to leave the file in the household general sharing media folder, or hide it somewhere so my 16 and 14 year old children couldn’t find it. (Yes, it’s rated R18. As a parent, I’ve found our certification system completely fucking useless as a guide to what I can show my children.)

Thing is, I shouldn’t even have thought about it. I’m comfortable with them seeing vanilla sexual material of that degree of explicitness. And it is absolutely core to my beliefs that non-vanilla sexuality shouldn’t be treated any differently. In the end, I left the file where they could stumble across it, but I had to think about it for days.

The point of all this being, I guess, that it’s an eternally on-going process. That’s part of the reason I’m so down on policing and so open to talking about ideas when I haven’t yet made up my mind. Finding your own path is not a one-time deal.

Sharing the love

Things we liked, or didn’t like, from around the internet this week.

Ally’s brilliant column on Equality. And celery. Several of The Lady Gardeners also hate celery.

The greatest typo ever.

From British rugby writer Stephen Jones: the best coach that New Zealand has ever produced. H/T: Ele, at HomePaddock

Following up on Clarisse Thorn’s wonderful post about what she wished she had been told in sex education, which we linked to last week, AnnaJCook at The Pursuit of Harpyness writes about what’s missing from sex education. If you’re not already reading The Pursuit of Harpyness, may I (Deb) recommend it? It’s one of my favourites of the big North American feminist blogs.

Rebecca Watson of SkepChick fame dared to suggest, very briefly, that it wasn’t appropriate for an unknown man to try to chat her up in the elevator at 2am in the morning. ElevatorGate ensued, in which some members of the sceptical and / or atheist community revealed just how much they think that women should shut up and get into the kitchen. The bile has carried on, and on, and on. Rebecca has finally written about the hate that has been coming her way: Mom, don’t read this.

Via Twitter, do feminists have better sex? (Tallulah says yes! Or, last night they did, at least.)

Why some women are wary of talking/writing/participating in sport.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 235 other followers