Banter in the Garden
|Fuck off, Bob Jones,… on Risky Business|
|Daniel Copeland on Risky Business|
|Emma on Risky Business|
|Deborah on A plea for your voice.|
|Facts on Well, that escalated quic…|
Tea and Strumpets
I often like The Listener. I was heartened by your balanced and reasonable feature on SlutWalk, I find most of your pieces interesting, and I like reading a publication run by somewhat of a rarity in your industry – a female editor. However, I am immeasurably disappointed that you, as a woman in leadership, allowed this piece of ”commentary” by Jonathan Milne on two young female leaders to be printed in your publication.
What purports to be an acknowledgement of the heavily gendered discussions on the battle for the Auckland Central candidacy between Jacinda Ardern and Nikki Kaye, devolves from the objective analysis that “It probably reflects badly on the rest of us that we’re more interested in the political equivalent of jelly-wrestling than in debating the ins and outs of the candidates’ policies” into a salacious, sexist and surface-level critique of two very intelligent and capable young women.
The article contains:
I hazard a guess that none of this information would have been considered pertinent in a commentary on the battle between two male candidates. Something which Jacinda Ardern also points out in the article.
As the Coordinator of the Wellington Young Feminists’ Collective, eliminating sexism from discourse on women’s achievements is of great interest to myself and the 970 members I represent.
One of our members brought this article to my attention, and her quote that “If two intelligent feminists have to pimp themselves out like this to do well in their career, you wonder if there is any hope for other young women in NZ.” Is one of the most accurate, but disappointing critiques I have heard regarding New Zealand media coverage of women in leadership.
I don’t believe that Nikki Kaye or Jacinda Ardern endeavoured to “pimp themselves out” for this article. On the contrary, their discussions of the unwanted “Battle of the Babes” label is one of the few redeeming features of Milne’s piece. It seems to me that Milne angled for this salaciousness from the first paragraph (about Arden’s short skirt and legs).
Frankly, I am disappointed that you would allow something which is so clearly sexist to be published. Not only does this reinforce the validity of sexist journalism, it also gives a clear message to young female readers that should they ever want to go into politics, their policies and intelligence won’t get half as much attention as the sleekness of their clothes, the size of their legs, whether they have or want a boyfriend and how tired they look.
As a woman in leadership yourself, I hope that you will give greater thought to the advancement of women through your publication in the future. I also hope Jonathan Milne will realise that his ‘commentary’ on these successful women is as cliché as it is offensive.
I wish both Auckland Central candidates well, and I hope they realise that other women in New Zealand care more about their policies than their “sleek orange numbers”.
[Ya'll know who I am]